363. Expositors of the Bible will never be able to understand, or to set forth a clear, consistent, correct interpretation of the Word of God as regards women until they abandon, once for all, the attempt to found the social, ecclesiastical and spiritual (as far as this life is concerned) status of Christian woman on the Fall, and found it, as they do man’s social, ecclesiastical and spiritual status, in the atonement of Jesus Christ. They cannot, for women, put the “new wine” of the Gospel into the old wine-skins of “condemnation” before God’s law. The skins burst, the wine is spilled; and such “theology” is responsible for much “free-thought”: among justice-loving persons, who confuse the teaching of the expositors with the teaching of the Bible, and denounce the latter instead of the former.
364. The Lord says, through the mouth of Moses, “Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers weights, a great and a small,” Deut. 15:13; and Proverbs 20:10 teaches us: “Divers weights and divers measures, both of them are alike abomination to the Lord.” It seems to us that divers weights and measures have been employed, occasionally, when translating the utterances of the Bible. For instance, the word for “minister, deacon,” diakonos, is used, properly, of a helper of any sort who is not a slave. It occurs 30 times in the N. T., and is almost always rendered “minister.” It is translated “servant” only 7 times and “deacon” 3 times, and “minister” 20 times. We will notice only those instances in which it may, or certainly does, refer to an ecclesiastical office,¾Romans 15:8; 1 Cornthians 3:5; 2 Corinthians 3:6; 6:4; 11:23; Ephesians 3:7; 6:21; Colossians 1:7, 23, 25; 4:7; 1 Thessalonians 3:2; 1 Timothy 4:6 (rendered “minister”). And Philippians 1:1; 1 Timothy 3:8, 12 (“deacon”). But in Romans 16:1, where the Apostle Paul says: “I commend unto you Phoebe our sister, who is diakonos of the church which is at Cenchrea,” referring, beyond all possibility of a doubt, to her status in the church, the A. V. translates “servant” (the R.V.margin translates “deaconess”). Bishop Lightfoot speaks of the mistranslation, “servant” in this place. He also gives strong reasons for believing that 1 Timothy 3:11 refers also to women deacons, and adds: “If the testimony borne in these two passages to a ministry of women in the Apostolic times had not been thus blotted out of our English Bibles, attention would probably have been directed to the subject at an earlier date, and our English church would not have remained so long maimed of one of her hands.” We suppose the Bishop’s thoughts went no further than to the thought of a needed order of “deaconesses,” when he penned these words. But they apply with greater force all the way along to woman’s full equality with man in the ministry of the Gospel,¾for until that point is reached, the Church will ever be maimed of one of her hands in her struggle with the world, the flesh and the devil.
I jumped ahead to post some excerpts from Lesson 43. It does my heart good to hear Bushnell call the differing weights and measure “an abomination to God”. Today I am very frustrated and I feel grieved about how Christians will blindly twist God’s Word in a manner which perpetuates and enables injustice. God, does Your heart grieve over this travesty?
Allow me to re-state what Bushnell said some 100 years ago and suggest that the years since have seen only advancement of the trend
The injustice against women is felt…. so God’s Word is blamed (and then rejected
) instead of placing the blame where it belongs- upon those who have misinterpreted God’s Word about women and twisted God’s intentions.
Who wins?
mankind loses- every which way- and Satan wins
Rise up ye daughters of Sarah! Claim your inheritance!
You said, the injustice is felt, God’s Word is blamed and therefore rejected instead of rejecting the poor interpretations. But there is now in the church a third affect: Christians are refusing to change their opinions about women in the Church because they believe it is conforming to the world’s (aka Satan’s) way instead of God’s. This is one of the arguments I have the most difficulties with. My only two responses is to point to the works done about women prior to the feminist movement and to say that if it is scholarly correct it should not matter whether it resembles the world or not. Most people, however, are not impressed with these answers. Any suggestions?
God is not surprised by this shift by the church.
And the church is reaping for this sowing.
SOW bad doctrine wrt marriage—> REAP divorce in church
I love Beth Moore.
She teaches women to study the Bible for themselves.
Therein lies hope.
When women can begin to hear from GOD and HIS Word rather than listening to this Christian radio personality and that book “always learning but never able to acknowledge the truth” 2 Tim 3:7
THEN they will know the TRUTH and the TRUTH will set them FREE!
I am aware of the difference in translations and translators and period of time as well as social conditions that affect the translations no matter how hard a translator trys to become a part of the system of belief that they are translating if only for a period of time. Regardless of the translation we need to study culture and history as well as scripture for ourselves. God will always make to crocked road straight when we have faith.